Amazon’s New Prime Offer: Delivering Six Health Clinics For 20,000 Workers In Dallas-Fort Worth

Amazon is getting into the health care delivery business, at least for its employees.

Last month, the e-commerce giant opened a primary care clinic in Irving and soon plans to open similar health centers in Coppell, Garland, Duncanville, North Fort Worth and near Haslet. The local launch is the first stage of a pilot project that will include four other U.S. metros by early next year, Amazon said.

Registered nurse Jodyne Schlachter explains the technology in one of the clinical rooms at the new Amazon health center in Irving. Amazon plans to open five additional clinics in North Texas this year.(PHOTO CREDIT: Ben Torres / Special Contributor)

Depending on results in Dallas-Fort Worth, Phoenix, Louisville, Detroit and San Bernardino, Calif., Amazon could eventually expand the clinics to additional employee hubs.

The project was conceived over a year ago, before COVID-19 emerged. Officials said the coronavirus has had little effect on their plans, except to put even more emphasis on virtual health visits.

Amazon’s centers will be staffed by Crossover Health, a California company that operates onsite and near-site facilities for some large self-insured employers, including Microsoft, Facebook and LinkedIn. The clinics will include doctors, nurses, chiropractors, physical therapists and behavioral health experts.

Amazon has about 20,000 employees in North Texas and has been growing rapidly here. About 11,000 work in operations and fulfillment centers, and the rest are corporate staff, management and tech workers.

Amazon is hardly a pioneer in this space. Walmart unveiled its own health clinics in 2014, charging $4 for a doctor’s visit for employees and $40 for store customers.

Amazon clinics will be limited to employees and their dependents. To accommodate so-called Amazonians on late shifts, the centers will have extended hours, including weekends.

“Hopefully, we’re within 10 miles of almost everybody who works for Amazon in the D-FW area,” said Derek Rubino, senior program manager for workplace health and safety. “Amazon was proud to offer health insurance to all full-time employees on their first day, including hourly workers. But many in D-FW don’t use the benefit. A lot of it really comes down to convenience. Having benefits only gets you part-way there.”

Amazon wants to remove barriers that keep workers away and persuade them to embrace primary care. That includes a range of services, from check-ups and immunizations to managing chronic conditions. Studies show primary care helps avoid more complicated, costly problems later.

“I honestly believe this is going to be life-changing for some folks,” Rubino said.

Onsite clinics are usually embraced by large employers and often were started to address workplace injuries. More recently, companies have adopted them for general medical care, putting clinics near the workplace, not inside it.

In 2017, one-third of companies with at least 5,000 employees had a general medical clinic at or near their worksite, according to a survey by Mercer, a human resources consultant. That share was twice as high as a decade earlier.

“The vast majority of these clinics have done very well, both in meeting their financial objectives as well as improving health and wellness,” said Larry Boress, executive director of the National Association of Worksite Health Centers.

Companies cite many reasons for investing in clinics, from lowering health spending to boosting worker productivity.

“Over 40% of employees who use the clinics don’t have a personal doctor,” Boress said, “and in the Mercer survey, more than 1 in 3 said the clinics served as their medical home. These clinics often become their only source of medical care.”

Health advocates, employers and insurers are emphasizing primary care as a way to bend the curve in health spending. In Plano, to encourage city employees to go to certain doctors, the health plan charges a copay of just $5 for a visit. In Fort Worth, it’s free for city employees to use certain clinics or virtual health providers — but there’s a stiff penalty for going to the ER if it’s not an emergency.

The Amazon health centers are in-network providers so employees will pay the standard rate, which depends on the health plan they’ve chosen. Amazon officials would not provide a number or range. On Amazon’s benefits website, the price of an in-network office visit is $30.

“We wouldn’t drive anyone away because of price,” Rubino said.

Crossover Health, which started in 2010, said employers save 30% on health spending through its program. One reason is that it claims to cut urgent care visits and imaging services by half.

During the pandemic, Crossover said it has shifted 90% of interactions to virtual care, and secure messaging — emails and texts between patients and providers — is up 40%.

“We can identify things that may be important to a specific population and really tailor the program,” said Dr. Stephen Ezeji-Okoye, Crossover’s chief medical officer. “The extended hours, the range of services, the coverage of young dependents — all that was designed for Amazon employees.”

Crossover also emphasizes short waits, usually fewer than five minutes, to see a doctor. Visits last 30 minutes or more, in part because doctors aren’t reimbursed on a fee-for-service basis.

“Crossover gets a monthly payment, based on a per-member fee or a cost-plus arrangement,” Ezeji-Okoye said, “and that keeps the focus on keeping patients healthy. The long encounters lead to fewer tests and imaging and fewer referrals because we have the time to establish a relationship.”

“While many companies and providers are rethinking their approaches to health care, Amazon’s move could have an outsize influence,” said Boress of the worksite trade group. “Employers like to benchmark themselves against the leading edge companies. They look to the leaders, and in many cases, they follow ’em.”

 

Source: The Dallas Morning News

New Report Signals Growth In Behavioral Health Sector

A new report from Colliers International signals there is a rising demand for behavioral health services in the US.

Construction for behavioral health hospitals has increased dramatically since 2017, according to the report. In 2018, the supply level was 3.8 million square feet. By 2019, that figure more than doubled to 8.1 million square feet. In 2020, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the sector is still growing with 6.4 million square feet set to deliver this year.

While construction costs are declining due to the pandemic, the costs for behavioral health hospitals are expected to hold steady in 2020 at $403.60 per square foot, which is up from $346.80 per square foot just in 2018.

The report states that while in any given year one in four Americans is impacted by behavioral health conditions there is a shortage of behavioral health physicians. Kaiser Foundation research found the US was only fulfilling around 44% of its need for mental healthcare professionals. One of the biggest factors affecting the shortage is the cost of care.

Colliers found the average cost per bed in a behavioral health asset averages $330,000. The Advisory Board said that treating patients with behavioral health diagnoses costs $900 more per month than for patients with no behavioral health diagnosis. As a result, less than half of patients receive treatment, according to Colliers.

And now, COVID-19 is placing an unprecedented impact on behavioral health services. In late March, a McKinsey survey found 63% of respondents were feeling anxious, depressed or both.

“The anxiety, stress, financial strife, grief, and general uncertainty of this time will undoubtedly lead to behavioral health crises,” McKinsey said in their survey.

The pandemic has signaled the greater need to integrate both physical and behavioral health. The company stated that integration between the two services could help lessen the shortage of people getting help.

Colliers echoed that sentiment by stating “the majority of patients with a behavioral health diagnosis also have a medical comorbidity.”

One of the suggestions from Colliers is screening in both physical and behavioral health settings. Moving forward, Colliers said the success of behavioral health services is dependent on a system where physical and behavioral conditions are treated together and where private/public partnerships occur more often. The 10 largest behavioral health hospitals in the U.S. are all either government-run or owned by nonprofits.

They note that the success of Orange County, CA initiative BeWell OC is just one example of what the healthcare system could look like in the future. The “wellness hub” was a public/private development.

 

Source: GlobeSt.

Encouraging Signs For MOB Development

Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, most health systems have been forced to put most their efforts into surviving the crisis, leaving little time to think about growing their ambulatory networks and initiating new medical office building (MOB) development projects.

In recent weeks, however, with the opening up of non-elective surgeries in most states, there are reports that this could be changing.

According to Ben Ochs, CEO and managing partner of one of the healthcare real estate (HRE) sector’s most-active development firms in recent years, Media, Pa.-based Anchor Health Properties, requests for proposals (RFPs) from the health systems are starting to resurface.

“Instead of actively pursuing development deals with health systems during the throes of the pandemic and knocking on their doors, Anchor has been, for the most part, waiting for the health systems to be the initiators,” Ochs noted. “That said, we have seen a number of system-sponsored RFPs come out … and I think at last count we’re in the middle of responding to about four, right now, which I think is a very positive sign.”

Mr. Ochs was one of three panelists to take part in a June 10 HRE webinar titled, “State of the Industry: What’s the Outlook for 2020 from an Investment, Development and Leasing/Operations Perspective?

The two-part online event, sponsored by Atlanta-based InterFace Conference Group, began with a panel discussion on investment. That was followed by a session on development that featured Mr. Ochs, along with Mark Davis of longtime Minneapolis-based HRE development firm Davis, and Chad Henderson of Pensacola, Fla.-based Catalyst Healthcare Real Estate (HRE). HREI Publisher Murray W. Wolf moderated the development discussion.

 

Source: HREI