Influx Of Capital Into Medical Real Estate Creating New Competition For Established Players

Growing demand for healthcare services has created a booming market for medical office buildings, bringing a host of new investors into the space and making it more challenging for the sector’s traditional players.

Anchor Health Properties Executive Vice President Katie Jacoby, whose company has been developing medical facilities for over 30 years, said she is seeing a surge of private equity competing for healthcare real estate deals.

“Ten years ago, healthcare was hardly even considered an asset class; now it’s one of the top asset classes,” said Jacoby, who will speak April 11 at Bisnow’s National Healthcare Mid-Atlantic event in D.C. “There is increased competition to purchase properties and to develop properties.”

Flagship Healthcare Properties Executive Vice President Gordon Soderlund, whose firm has been developing medical real estate since the 1980s, is also seeing more private equity firms and REITs making big investments in the healthcare space.

“There’s a lot of competition pursuing development,” Soderlund said. “Our returns on costs are being driven down because there are plenty of players to respond to an RFP … It’s even more competitive on the acquisition side. There’s so much capital chasing medical real estate right now.”

Nationwide transaction volume in healthcare real estate reached a new record in 2017, according to JLL’s 2018 Healthcare Real Estate Outlook, with a significant portion of the growth in the medical office building sector. The JLL report also found the sources of capital investing in medical office buildings are expanding. In 2017, 19% of MOBs were owned by private investors, 11% by REITs and the remaining 70% by healthcare providers, the traditionally dominant owners in the space.

The growing investment in medical real estate comes as the United States’ aging population is creating more demand for healthcare services. The number of people 65 years and older will nearly double by 2050, according to JLL‘s report, and those over 65 spend five times more on annual medical expenses.

“People see it as a stable asset class,” Jacoby said. “Everyone sees it . They have aging parents themselves … They can experience it on their own personal level.”

The types of tenants occupying medical office buildings is also evolving toward more stable operators, giving investors more confidence in the properties.  As recently as five years ago, the most common tenant in an MOB was a physician with a private practice in 3K SF to 5K SF.

“But individual private practices are less common today, with physicians being employed by health systems or forming groups of doctors,” Jacoby said. “A lot of these private doctors are now employed by the health system. If they’re not employed by a health system, consolidations of physician practices into larger conglomerates are allowing them to serve as anchor tenants similar to a health system.”

Soderlund also said he’s seeing physicians being acquired by health systems and consolidating to lease larger blocks of office space, a trend he views as a positive for landlords.

“One day we might be leasing office space to a six-physician practice, and once they’re acquired our lessee is now an investment-graded hospital system,” Soderland said. “From a credit perspective, that’s great. With more large tenants occupying medical office buildings, more investors are interested in buying the properties.

“Hospitals are consolidating, making them stronger, creditworthy tenants,” Jacoby said. “I think that makes it more attractive for other investors that have traditionally invested in other asset classes.”

Jacoby and Soderlund will discuss trends in the medical real estate industry April 11 at Bisnow’s full-day National Healthcare Mid-Atlantic event at the Washington Marriott Georgetown.

 

Source: Bisnow

Dallas Area Poised As A Growing Hub For Life Sciences Industry

Dallas-Fort Worth is among the life sciences hubs in the nation that are positioned for major growth, according to a new report from real estate services and investment firm CBRE.

According to the report, DFW is one of the emerging hotspots for the life sciences industry and has benefited from the sector’s momentum across the nation.

CBRE said that a number of indicators suggest robust expansion for the industry. For starters, venture-capital funding for U.S. life sciences companies saw an 86 percent increase for the year, ending in September, to the tune of $15.8 billion. And, life sciences lab space under construction in the sector’s five largest U.S. markets expanded to 6 million square feet last year, a 101 percent increase.

In its report, CBRE said it focused on the human life sciences industry, which consists of manufacturing, testing and research-and-development work in biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices. The top established life sciences hubs were analyzed and ranked according to four main criteria for each market: the number of scientists in key industry categories, the industry funding for local life sciences companies, size and long-term growth of the life sciences workforce, and inventory of industry lab space.

Between 2014-2017, Dallas-Fort Worth was the seventh fastest growing life sciences market in the nation. With two biological science higher education programs ranked in the top 100, according to U.S. News & World Report, Dallas-Fort Worth is now ranked 11th for producing new life sciences talent.

There are also three hospitals in North Texas that are ranked in the top 100, the report said, that bolsters the relationship between medical research institutions and life sciences innovation.

“The DFW area is an attractive market for companies in the life sciences industry,” CBRE Vice Chairman Jeff Ellerman said in a statement. “There is an enormous amount of high-tech talent in the area, which helps support the cross pollination between tech and life sciences.”

That makes North Texas attractive for companies.

“When you combine the growing market with available talent, it becomes a no-brainer for large companies in the pharmaceutical and medical technology sectors to choose North Texas for their headquarters,” Ellerman said.

 

Source: Dallas Innovates

Healthcare Real Estate Investors Choose to Diversify in Face of Fever-Pitch Property Demand

It’s a highly competitive environment when it comes to healthcare real estate out West, so say InterFace Conference Group’s Healthcare Real Estate West panelists.

One of the central themes of the day-long conference, which was held March 6 at the Omni Los Angeles and attracted 219 attendees, was the pent-up property demand from investors. However, most panelists agree the opportunities are somewhat limited due to a lack of new product and the long-term holding pattern many healthcare investors have adopted.

“You have all this demand, yet transaction volume is staying flat,” said Darryl Freling, managing principal at MedProperties Realty Advisors and moderator of the 2019 Outlook panel. “Where’s the bottleneck? So much is held by healthcare systems and they’re not letting go because clearly there’s just so much demand.”

Shane Seitz, fellow panelist and senior vice president at CBRE, doesn’t see this level of trading picking up, at least not with the current healthcare supply.

“REITs don’t get incentivized to turn over their product,” Seitz noted. “They buy and hold. They treat it just like the nonprofit health system does. They want to have it forever. We also have foreign and domestic groups coming in. They historically invest in funds, but now they’re saying, ‘You know what, I’m going to buy strategically in this space.’”

Seitz further noted that the level of capital in the healthcare real estate sector was around $6 billion in 2008. It’s now $12 billion.

“It’s that instant capital coming in,” Seitz explained. “Everyone has read the headlines about healthcare and they want to buy.”

This frustration has caused many healthcare players to pivot. After all, what happens when one investment vehicle dries up? You look elsewhere. That’s led to diversification.

“Healthcare real estate has really changed a lot over the past 20 years,” said fellow panelist P.J. Camp, principal and co-founder of H2C. “It used to be it was just medical office buildings of 40,000 to 60,000 square feet, two to three stories, on a health campus. This is not at all the case now. With all the capital flooded into our space, it’s driven the product type to be much more diverse.”

Healthcare real estate, for many, now includes not just hospitals and standard medical office buildings (MOBs), but skilled nursing facilities, satellite buildings, home health services, wellness centers, walk-in clinics, seniors housing, micro hospitals and rehabilitation and long-term care centers.

“I never would have thought of seniors housing and long-term care as the world we play in,” Camp continued. “I don’t know when that changed, but seniors and medical buyers have come together. MOB means so many different things now. It’s confusing the market a little bit. We used to know what an MOB was. Now we have to think of all these different products and uses in terms of long-term viability. It’s a very complicated market today. It used to be so simple.”

Community-Driven

One of the largest motivations for the diversification in uses is the community-driven, patient-facing approach many are taking to healthcare nowadays. Deeni Taylor, fellow panelist and executive vice president and CEO of Physicians Realty Trust, believed this is where the focus should have been all along, meaning this “pivot” is essentially a return to Healthcare 101.

“The successful operation of all these products is dependent on the goal of the healthcare organization,” Taylor said. “If it’s for the patient, the probability of success is much higher. If it’s simply a reimbursement scheme, that real estate play is a disaster. It’s just a matter of time. That’s just not a risk we’re willing to take as a public company.”

Karen Costello, senior program manager at Hoag Hospital and participant on the Hospitals & Systems panel, believes organizations will need to embrace the patient and their care as the industry faces two major hurdles.

“We need to be flexible and develop new places to engage with consumers and we have to create stickiness with them because we have to deal with two tidal waves: the aging demographic and tech distraction,” Costello said. “They’re both coming. The question is what’s going to hit first and will the two clash?”

Panelists note that this creates an interesting conflict, as seniors prefer a more personal approach to healthcare, while the younger generation appreciates technology that prevents them from having to physically visit a doctor’s office.

Convenience-Driven

Unless an organization is in a specific niche, such as seniors housing or wellness and preventative care, companies must accommodate both populations and preferences. One of the easiest ways to do this is through micro hospitals, walk-in clinics and ancillary service providers, such as home healthcare agencies.

“We have a disruption issue,” said Jeff West, Hospitals and Systems panelist and executive director of Irvine, Calif.-based Providence St. Joseph Hospital. “The disruption from within is incremental. The continuum of care keeps marching on. What we really need to get to is healthy populations. That’s keeping people out of the hospital. That now involves delivering doctors and nurses to patients’ homes. That’s a very viable, cost-effective model.”

West also says that outside disruptors, chiefly Amazon, are advancing and revolving their model around artificial intelligence. The e-commerce giant recently joined forces with Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase on a healthcare company called Haven. The joint venture’s focus is threefold: better access to health providers, easy-to-understand insurance benefits and affordable prescription drugs. Haven will only be available to employees of the three firms, at least for now. The joint venture has stated it eventually plants to share its findings with others outside its network.

Costello sees this play as one the current healthcare industry will need to respond to — and quickly.

“We need to start looking at healthcare as a lifestyle brand,” Costello said. “All healthcare needs to start reflecting wellness. We need to create ‘easy’ so we can be around when people like Amazon come to market. Healthcare has to be somewhere where people want to be. We’re marching down this brand of consumerism, and consumers want to be in Newport Coast. They want to be at the Irvine Spectrum Center.”

John Wadsworth, senior vice president of Colliers and a Leasing & Operations Update panelist, believes partnerships and one-stop shops are where the industry is headed. In fact, he believed retail and healthcare have more in common than many may think.

“Healthcare is retail,” Wadsworth said. “Retail conversions are a real opportunity. How many mall operators have reached out and said, ‘Help us. Be our savior’? It can work. The fundamentals of those spaces can work. They’re not an end-all, be-all solution, but they’re here to stay.”

Pacific Medical Buildings (PMB) is one firm capitalizing on this opportunity. The firm is converting the 50,000-square-foot, 1980s-era Harkins Theatre in Goodyear, Ariz., into a build-to-suit medical office building.

“Converting the movie theater drove down costs and gave us speed to market,” said Jake Dinnen, senior vice president of development for PMB and a Trends & Market Forces panelist. “It was 98 percent leased from day one.”

Connection-Driven

Another retailer has caught Costello’s eye as she calculates the “stickiness” formula for consumers: CVS/pharmacy.

“We use CVS as a benchmark,” Costello said. “With MinuteClinic, they’ve got easy down. They’re convenient, they’re connected. They don’t have specialist physicians. Health systems need to play in that space if they’re going to do prevention health. CVS has established a stronghold there. We need to watch them carefully and meet and exceed them in the way they’re embracing the consumer.”

The lack of specialist physicians means CVS can only have so long of a reach. It also reinforces the notion that partnerships will maximize everyone’s value.

“We really need to know where CVS starts and stops, and where we then start,” said Jeff Land, senior vice president of corporate real estate for Dignity Health and fellow Hospitals & Systems panelist. “When you work in population health, it really becomes about who you partner with because you don’t have to be an expert in everything.”

Whether it was CVS, Walmart, Amazon or each other, panelists agreed competition was out there. Neil Carolan, senior vice president of Rendina Cos. and a Trends & Market Forces panelist believes in mutually beneficial partnerships, noting that 80 percent of his firm’s business is repeat business. One relationship he’s focusing on currently is with retail landlords,

Carolan adheres to the old saying, “if you can’t beat hem, join them” — or at least move in alongside them. “Will people go to a doctort next to Macy’s?” Carolan asked. “Probably. They like to put pediatricians near grocery stores. Mall redevelopment is going to be a big trend. We’re doing several of them. The pipeline is long. Competition doesn’t scare me. I don’t think it scares anyone. Bring it on.”

 

Source: REBusiness Online