Posts

Life Sciences Space Continues To Be In High Demand, With Low Vacancies And Rising Rents

Expansion in medical research around DNA is driving growth in the biotech sector and boosting demand for life science space.

Advances in technology over the last decade changed the way medical scientists work, first modeling their theories or ideas on computers before taking them to the bench, according to Steve Purpura, vice chairman of the Boston consulting practice and lead/director of the life sciences practice group with real estate services firm CBRE. As a result, the allocation of lab space in research facilities decreased from a 50:50 office to lab ratio a few years ago to 60:40 today, he notes.

This trend is likely to continue, according to Roger Humphrey, executive managing director and leader of the life sciences group with real estate services firm JLL. Commenting on JLL’s “Journey to the Next Gen Lab,” a report citing a trend toward greater agility in research space design, he noted that wet lab space in research facilities is shrinking, while flex and office space for computational science is growing as scientists spend more time analyzing data. The report shows that flexibility in lab space design and location is required to allow sudden shifts in research priorities and access to talent.

But aggregated demand for highly sophisticated lab space and cutting-edge pharmaceutical production facilities has exploded with expansion of the industry into personalized medicine and increased capital flowing to life science research and development. According to the most recent CBRE life science report, venture capital investments in life science are up 53 percent compared to 10 years ago.

The advent of personalized medicine has spawned a subset of life science industry incubators and early-stage companies focused on developing and manufacturing “small batch” pharmaceuticals, adding pressure to the demand for lab space within or nearby life science clusters, according to Frank Petz, managing director of JLL’s Boston-based capital markets group.

As a result, core life science markets—Boston-Cambridge, San Francisco, San Diego, the Raleigh-Durham Research Triangle and Seattle—are enjoying construction booms and growth in rents, which have escalated more than 50 percent over the last three years, according to the CBRE report.

The boom in funding has also increased competition and furthered the talent war between life science companies.

“The cost of rent is low on the list of their concerns,” says Petz. “It’s all about talent.”

Therefore, locations with premiere research universities and teaching hospitals outside core life science markets are also seeing construction of new research facilities, as life science firms seek STEM talent to fill the growing number of job vacancies.

According to the CBRE report, life science employment soared 23.5 percent to nearly 1.7 million workers between 2001 and 2016, compared to 10.2 percent for overall U.S. employment. Additionally, the rapid pace of technological advancement in the life science sector generated a 26 percent surge in biotech jobs between 2013 and 2016.

Urban markets with premiere universities and teaching hospitals, such as Philadelphia and New York City, have growing life science clusters because they offer the largest STEM talent pools, according to Purpura. While developers are replacing obsolete buildings in these markets with 10-story research facilities, office and industrial buildings in suburban markets, specifically San Diego and Raleigh-Durham, are being converted to lab space.

Humphrey also stresses the need to build flexibility into research space, so scientists can easily reconfigure workspaces to accommodate different types of research and facilitate collaboration with colleagues.

Mobile benches and unassigned workspaces, for example, allow for fast changes in personnel and type of work performed, he notes. In addition, hanging retractable electrical cords from the ceiling, so users aren’t limited to placing equipment against walls, and hiding technical infrastructure behind facades can allow easy movement of people and equipment.

 

Source: NREI

Influx Of Capital Into Medical Real Estate Creating New Competition For Established Players

Growing demand for healthcare services has created a booming market for medical office buildings, bringing a host of new investors into the space and making it more challenging for the sector’s traditional players.

Anchor Health Properties Executive Vice President Katie Jacoby, whose company has been developing medical facilities for over 30 years, said she is seeing a surge of private equity competing for healthcare real estate deals.

“Ten years ago, healthcare was hardly even considered an asset class; now it’s one of the top asset classes,” said Jacoby, who will speak April 11 at Bisnow’s National Healthcare Mid-Atlantic event in D.C. “There is increased competition to purchase properties and to develop properties.”

Flagship Healthcare Properties Executive Vice President Gordon Soderlund, whose firm has been developing medical real estate since the 1980s, is also seeing more private equity firms and REITs making big investments in the healthcare space.

“There’s a lot of competition pursuing development,” Soderlund said. “Our returns on costs are being driven down because there are plenty of players to respond to an RFP … It’s even more competitive on the acquisition side. There’s so much capital chasing medical real estate right now.”

Nationwide transaction volume in healthcare real estate reached a new record in 2017, according to JLL’s 2018 Healthcare Real Estate Outlook, with a significant portion of the growth in the medical office building sector. The JLL report also found the sources of capital investing in medical office buildings are expanding. In 2017, 19% of MOBs were owned by private investors, 11% by REITs and the remaining 70% by healthcare providers, the traditionally dominant owners in the space.

The growing investment in medical real estate comes as the United States’ aging population is creating more demand for healthcare services. The number of people 65 years and older will nearly double by 2050, according to JLL‘s report, and those over 65 spend five times more on annual medical expenses.

“People see it as a stable asset class,” Jacoby said. “Everyone sees it . They have aging parents themselves … They can experience it on their own personal level.”

The types of tenants occupying medical office buildings is also evolving toward more stable operators, giving investors more confidence in the properties.  As recently as five years ago, the most common tenant in an MOB was a physician with a private practice in 3K SF to 5K SF.

“But individual private practices are less common today, with physicians being employed by health systems or forming groups of doctors,” Jacoby said. “A lot of these private doctors are now employed by the health system. If they’re not employed by a health system, consolidations of physician practices into larger conglomerates are allowing them to serve as anchor tenants similar to a health system.”

Soderlund also said he’s seeing physicians being acquired by health systems and consolidating to lease larger blocks of office space, a trend he views as a positive for landlords.

“One day we might be leasing office space to a six-physician practice, and once they’re acquired our lessee is now an investment-graded hospital system,” Soderland said. “From a credit perspective, that’s great. With more large tenants occupying medical office buildings, more investors are interested in buying the properties.

“Hospitals are consolidating, making them stronger, creditworthy tenants,” Jacoby said. “I think that makes it more attractive for other investors that have traditionally invested in other asset classes.”

Jacoby and Soderlund will discuss trends in the medical real estate industry April 11 at Bisnow’s full-day National Healthcare Mid-Atlantic event at the Washington Marriott Georgetown.

 

Source: Bisnow